What do 1 in 3 people say about change? Some surprising stats!

What do 1 in 3 people say about change? Some surprising stats!

So how much do we know about people's reactions to change? I've been collecting reactions to change of individuals in my coaching and research for several years. The data below come from over 600 responses to my online tests (except where indicated) - the Change Perception Index and the Luck Readiness Index.

These stats about change - may surprise you!

1. One in three people would avoid change if they could.

Would you normally avoid change if you could?

If you said yes, then you'd join the 34% of respondents who agreed or completely agreed with that sentiment.

2. Over 76.51% of people said they could be fearless in a situation if they need to be.

Would you be fearless if you needed to be? Are the majority merely displaying bravado? Have you seen most other people being fearless?

How many people do you know who are not interested in learning anything new? More or less than 1 in 10?

4. Goal setting as a way of creating change seems to be less popular now that anytime time since the beginning beginning of the previous decade.

Graph shows a decline in publications about goal setting since the Global Financial Crisis - are we finally over goals?

5. Almost 1 in 3 people say that if they do not see immediate results for their efforts they usually give up and do something else.

32.2% say they do not persist if they do not see immediate progress, a further 21.3% are ambivalent. Less than half of people say indicate they would persist in the face of a lack of immediate progress.

What does this say about how we structure change programs - either personal or organisational? What does this say about learning experiences?

6. Just over two thirds of people do not find study interesting.

Only 37.5% of people disagreed that study was boring.

What does this say about how our learning and training is structured? What are the implications of this for a dynamic, flexible workforce of lifelong learners?

7. Almost 1 in 4 people say they cannot accept failure if they try something and do not succeed.

21% disagreed that they can accept failure when they do not succeed. A further 16.75% were ambivalent about their ability to accept failure - that's 37.75% who have some degree of difficulty accepting failure.

How does our fear of failure prevent us from changing, studying, learning and transforming?

8. Almost two thirds of people say that uncertainty about the future worries them

62.71% of people agreed that uncertainty about the future worries them. Only 20.79% said they were not worried about the future.

How does all this worry translate into barriers or catalysts for change? How can we make people more at ease with uncertainty?

9. Almost 9 out of 10 people believe their lives will be very different in five years time.

86.44% of people agreed their lives will be very different in 5 years time. Only 4.52% disagreed.

So nearly everyone believes their lives are going to change. What does this mean for change programs, education, training? How can we leverage this expectation?

10. Less than half agree they have a clear picture of what they are going to be doing and how they are going to get there.

46.55% of people agreed they had a clear picture of their future and how they'd get there. 30.27% definitely disagreed they had such a clear picture, with the rest ambivalent.

So most people think their lives are going to change, but most dont have a clear idea of how they'll change.

What do these insights into change tell us about change programs, helping individuals or organisations change? What can we do to make study as a method of change more attractive? How can we design change programs to deliver early progress and then sustained progress? How can we help people embrace uncertainty and recognise the value of failure? How do we reconcile the 1 in 3 who would avoid change if they could with the 9 out of 10 who see change as definitely present in their future lives?

Professor Jim Bright, BA (Hons) PhD is a consultant organisational psychologist, medico-legal assessor and Professor of Career Education and Development at Australian Catholic University. He is the co-author of the Chaos Theory of Careers published by Routledge and has published 10 other books. He has extensively published in the academic literature on organisational psychology and career development. He has presented many keynote talks around the world on change, chance, creativity, leadership and the Chaos Theory of Careers including to the NCDA in St Louis, CANNEXUS in Ottawa, and will be presenting a keynote to the CDAA in Perth Australia in 2014-15. He appears regularly on Sky Business Your Careers, ABC radio and occasionally on Studio 10 on Channel 10. He writes a weekly column on career development in the Fairfax newspapers. He is the owner of the popular Linkedin Careers Debate Group and runs Bright and Associates. www.jimbright.com.

Gina Scriven

Glass Artist and Artistic Director

4w

I have found this article to be confusing in places, not well laid out, not edited and very unprofessional. Which leaves me to question as to how you came up with these stats and if it was actually generated by AI

Like
Reply
John Rakis

Workforce Development and Criminal Justice Consultant at John Rakis and Associates - Enjoying Retirement

9y
Like
Reply
Michał Sala

Project Manager at Generali

9y

Hi Jim, it's an interesting read. But stats for each of these 10 questions taken separately don't show if we're in fact seeing few types of people that would bundle these answers into consistent attitudes. Did those show up in this research?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics